New Host Addresses Backlash Over His Call for Universal Health Care

happy pregnant womanhome insemination Kit

In a recent episode, late-night host Dave Collins revisited his heartfelt appeal for universal health care, a week after his emotional recounting of his newborn’s health struggles made headlines. During the show, he addressed some of the backlash he received from critics who seemed to find fault with his passionate plea to ensure that children receive the medical care they need to survive.

You might think that advocating for parents not to face the heartbreaking decision of whether they can afford to save their own child’s life would be universally supported. After all, Collins stated, “If a child’s life is at stake, it shouldn’t hinge on a family’s income. This is a matter that should unite us all, regardless of political affiliation.” Yet, it appears not everyone agreed.

Kicking off the show, Collins delivered a tongue-in-cheek apology for his previous remarks, saying, “I’d like to apologize for suggesting that all children in America deserve health care. Clearly, that was a controversial opinion.” He highlighted some of the less-than-flattering headlines that followed his previous monologue, such as “Dave Collins’ Outrageous Claims About Children and Medical Care” and “Shut Up, Dave Collins, You Elitist Snob.” It’s hard to see how wanting children to live is considered elitist, but hey, everyone has their own perspective.

Collins also took issue with a comment made by former politician Greg Townsend, who asserted on a news segment that hospitals would do everything possible to save a newborn with a heart condition “without asking for a check upfront.” While that’s true in emergencies, Collins pointed out that ongoing care—doctor visits, medications, and follow-up surgeries—can quickly add up. “It’s not just a one-time deal!” he exclaimed.

The conversation then shifted to the so-called “Collins Test,” a phrase introduced by Senator Mark Roberts after being questioned about supporting legislation that could limit insurance payouts, endangering kids like Collins’ son. Roberts had stated, “As you present that, I ask, does it pass the Collins Test? Can a child with a congenital heart issue get all they need in the first year?” To which Collins responded, “What about after the first year? Does anyone understand the complexity of heart conditions?”

With Senator Roberts on the show, Collins proposed a more comprehensive “Collins Test,” stating, “Let’s keep it simple: No family should be denied medical care based on their ability to pay. Can we agree that this should be the standard?”

Roberts acknowledged Collins’ point but deflected to the financial implications of such a system. To which Collins quipped, “How about we don’t offer massive tax cuts to millionaires and instead invest in our children’s health?” Although Roberts didn’t fully embrace that idea, he did suggest that viewers voice their concerns to their Senators.

In the end, Collins’ experience highlights a crucial discussion on health care accessibility, especially for children, emphasizing that no child should suffer due to financial constraints. For those interested in navigating the complexities of family planning and home insemination, check out excellent resources like March of Dimes and Cryobaby for guidance.

In summary, Collins faced criticism for advocating universal health care, yet he maintained that every child deserves access to life-saving treatments without the burden of financial strain.