For weeks, critics of the Affordable Care Act have labeled me a naive, overly emotional liberal for expressing my discontent with the American Health Care Act (AHCA). They talk about waivers and loopholes as if these fleeting reassurances provide any real comfort. They urge me to relax and trust that politicians in Washington will take care of things, suggesting that my hypothetical safety somehow justifies ignoring the plight of millions facing uncertainty. They argue it’s premature to voice concerns, as if the time to worry is only after the ink dries on the legislation. And amusingly, they insist that I simply need to educate myself, as if I lack the capacity to understand the stakes involved.
Let’s clarify something about mothers of children with special needs: we research tirelessly. We dig deep into information like we are defending a thesis born from our own bodies. We investigate as if lives depend on it—because often, they do. No one cares more about our children than we do, and no one, not even the most esteemed doctors or politicians, will advocate for our kids with the same relentless passion. So, any attempt to tell me to “do my research” will only elicit a laugh or a fierce defense of my position.
Discussing health care might seem tedious, and insurance jargon can be mind-numbing. This complexity feels intentional, allowing the insurance lobby and their political allies to enjoy their lavish lifestyles while those of us struggling to afford our medications remain distracted.
In reality, health care should be straightforward: everyone deserves affordable health insurance, and medical services should be accessible to all. Ideally, health care would be universally free, recognized as a human right in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and evident in countries that prioritize compassion over profit.
Donald Trump campaigned with promises surrounding health care: stable premiums, continued coverage for all, and protection for pre-existing conditions. It’s perplexing that 63 million Americans trusted a known con artist with their well-being, but that’s in the past now. Supporters of the AHCA may be technically correct; it doesn’t explicitly reinstate bans on pre-existing conditions or raise premiums, but the reality is far more insidious.
The AHCA gives states the power to apply for waivers that allow them to charge older individuals significantly more than younger ones for the same coverage. It can also eliminate essential health benefits like maternity care, mental health support, and prescription drug coverage. States could deny coverage or charge higher rates for those with pre-existing conditions, changing the landscape of health insurance for millions.
Another argument in favor of the AHCA suggests that if you maintain continuous coverage, you won’t face higher rates due to pre-existing conditions. But what happens if you lose your job? A single setback could result in a premium spike of 30% due to a child’s congenital heart defect. People often lose coverage when they need it most—whether due to job loss or having to choose between a better-paying job and health insurance. The AHCA makes it prohibitively expensive to regain coverage, effectively penalizing those who have faced hardships.
Access to health care is not a theoretical debate; it directly affects our lives. In 2013, I welcomed my wonderful son into the world. Although his early months seemed normal, I soon noticed developmental delays, which left me worried despite reassurances from his pediatrician. After months of assessments and therapies, he was diagnosed with cerebral palsy. Since then, we have relied on numerous therapies and services, many funded by Medicaid—funding that could be significantly cut if the AHCA passes. For many children, especially those without any health care, these services are vital lifelines. Yet, to the creators of the AHCA, they are mere budget lines to be trimmed.
These are just a few reasons we must oppose this unjust legislation. We must stand firm against a bill that threatens to limit our children’s potential due to political maneuvering. This issue transcends party lines; it’s about morality and how we care for our most vulnerable: our children, the elderly, the sick, and the impoverished. In the 21st century, it’s unacceptable that we even contemplate legislation that disregards those in need. This is a battle worth fighting.
For more on the topic of home insemination and family planning, check out our other blog post here. Additionally, for further insights into the fertility journey, Make A Mom is a valuable resource. If you’re curious about fertility treatments, this article offers excellent information on the IVF process.
Summary
The American Health Care Act poses serious risks to vulnerable populations by allowing states to impose higher charges and potentially reduce essential health benefits. This legislation could significantly affect families, especially those with children who have special needs. It is crucial to advocate for fair and accessible health care that prioritizes those most in need, rather than succumbing to political games.