Hey Judge Thompson, How Do We Explain a 6-Month Sentence for Rape to Our Daughters?

happy babyself insemination kit

In a troubling case, a judge sentenced a convicted rapist, who faced a maximum of 14 years in prison, to just six months in county jail. This decision raises significant questions for families, especially when trying to explain such a verdict to young daughters.

On January 18, 2014, 19-year-old Jake Harris was apprehended by two students who witnessed him assaulting an unconscious woman behind a dumpster at a university campus. The students intervened, leading to Harris’s arrest as he attempted to flee. During the police interviews, one of the witnesses was so distraught he could barely articulate what he had witnessed.

Harris was charged with five felonies: rape of an intoxicated person, rape of an unconscious person, and more. Despite the gravity of the situation, he was released on $150,000 bail, and subsequently withdrew from the university, which barred him from campus and removed his profile from the swim team website.

While he claimed his intentions weren’t to harm, the evidence was overwhelming. He was found guilty of three felony counts: assault with intent to commit rape, penetration of an intoxicated person, and penetration of an unconscious person. Yet, Judge Thompson decided on a mere six-month sentence, suggesting that a longer prison term would have a detrimental impact on Harris, who he believed would not pose a future risk to others.

In his reasoning, the judge expressed concern for Harris’s future and noted the defendant’s supposed remorse, which he attributed to Harris’s plans to educate others about the dangers of excessive drinking and sexual behavior. This perspective is troubling, especially since Harris’s remorse seemed more focused on his own situation rather than the harm he inflicted.

The young woman who was assaulted delivered a powerful 12-page impact statement in court, beginning with the harrowing line, “You don’t know me, but you’ve been inside me, and that’s why we’re here today.” Her words resonate deeply and should be shared widely; they carry the weight of a survivor fighting against the culture of victim-blaming.

In her statement, she challenged the notion that discussions should center around campus drinking culture rather than the serious issue of consent and sexual assault. She emphasized the need to teach respect for women rather than simply addressing alcohol consumption.

The defense focused heavily on the alcohol involved, attempting to frame the narrative as one of two intoxicated individuals rather than recognizing the clear violation of consent. This dynamic illustrates the pervasive nature of rape culture, which often shifts blame onto victims rather than holding perpetrators accountable.

The judge’s leniency was justified by Harris’s age and lack of prior offenses, but this raises the question of why society would protect someone who committed such a heinous act. The message being sent is troubling: how can we expect accountability when a rapist is treated with such leniency?

The victim was subjected to a barrage of irrelevant questions about her personal life during the trial, highlighting the insensitivity often faced by survivors.

As she concluded her statement, she shared a message of solidarity with other women, encouraging them never to stop fighting for their voices to be heard. She reminded everyone that they are valuable and deserving of respect.

It’s crucial to reflect on the implications of this case and the message it sends to our daughters. We must advocate for a culture of consent and accountability, ensuring that victims are believed and supported, rather than being subjected to scrutiny and blame.

For more information on pregnancy and home insemination, this resource from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is excellent. If you’re considering artificial insemination, check out CryoBaby’s at-home insemination kit for detailed guidance.

Summary

The recent sentencing of a rapist to just six months in jail raises serious questions about how we discuss justice and accountability with our daughters. The case highlights the troubling aspects of rape culture and the need for a societal shift towards supporting victims and holding offenders accountable.