If you haven’t been paying attention, the LuLaRoe leggings phenomenon has taken the internet by storm. Renowned for their ultra-soft fabrics and vibrant, quirky designs, these leggings have garnered a huge following among women nationwide.
The pursuit of these coveted leggings is often a frustrating experience—endless scrolling through Facebook groups, limited stock on popular styles, and a price tag of $25 that feels steep after dealing with the hassle. I’ve seen women nearly come to blows over a pair of pizza wedge leggings. No exaggeration.
When I first explored the world of LuLaRoe in the fall, I had yet to experience these mythical leggings myself. Thanks to some generous LLR consultants online, I received a few pairs to test out, including a so-called “unicorn”—a rare find—in the form of solid black leggings. Jackpot! Though I’ve since purchased several more pairs and enjoy their softness while lounging at home, my unicorn black leggings quickly turned into a disappointment. After just a couple of washes (following the care instructions), I discovered holes in the crotch seam. Finding a replacement pair has proven nearly impossible, given their rarity.
Even if I had the time to sift through countless Facebook groups to locate a consultant willing to help with my exchange, the thought of packaging up my leggings, taking my kids to the post office, and paying for shipping feels like an insurmountable task for a pair of leggings.
I’m not alone in my frustration. Our discussions about LuLaRoe often attract comments from women who love the brand as well as those lamenting their leggings’ poor durability. Many report holes appearing almost immediately after washing. The recurring complaints about the quality of the leggings and the convoluted return policies have led me to question LuLaRoe’s practices. Let’s be clear: I recognize that the consultants are not to blame; they are caught in the middle of a corporate issue stemming from significant quality control lapses. Somewhere along the line, corners were cut to keep up with demand, impacting both consultants and customers.
Our associate editor, Grace Taylor, was quoted in a Business Insider article stating, “These leggings tear like wet tissue paper.” She certainly knows the struggle, having accumulated quite the collection of LuLaRoe items before stepping back due to quality concerns.
Dissatisfied customers have united in a dedicated Facebook group to voice their grievances. Two individuals have escalated their complaints further by filing a lawsuit against LuLaRoe for allegedly selling defective products. Julie Smith and Rebecca Anderson, the plaintiffs, are challenging the company in California, accusing them of misleading marketing to millions of women who invested their hard-earned money and valuable time into obtaining these leggings. If they succeed, the outcome could set a precedent for anyone who bought LuLaRoe leggings after March 31, 2016.
Here’s hoping Smith and Anderson can take on a company that appears to be exploiting both its consultants and its customers. For more on navigating challenges in the realm of home insemination, check out our post on advertiser disclosure. Also, if you’re interested in boosting your fertility, Make a Mom offers some great insights. For comprehensive information on pregnancy, Healthline is an excellent resource.
In summary, the ongoing issues with LuLaRoe leggings highlight a significant quality control problem, leaving many customers frustrated and seeking recourse. The situation continues to evolve, with legal actions bringing attention to the brand’s practices.