Abstract:
In contemporary society, the use of glitter has transitioned from a symbol of youthful exuberance to a significant environmental concern, particularly for parents engaged in children’s art activities. This paper discusses the implications of glitter usage, its environmental ramifications, and alternative options available to conscientious consumers.
During my early adulthood, weekend evenings were often spent with friends indulging in vibrant, glitter-infused cosmetics, aromatic perfumes, and carefree dancing. However, with the advent of parenthood, my relationship with glitter has drastically changed. As a parent, the glittery allure of arts and crafts has manifested itself into a persistent domestic nuisance.
Glitter can be likened to the least desirable affliction within the crafting domain; it epitomizes the trifecta of artistic frustrations: its cleanup is an arduous task, it possesses an uncanny ability to infiltrate every crevice, and for those with children enamored by embellishments, it becomes an omnipresent annoyance. The act of sending someone an envelope filled with glitter is often regarded as an act of malice; the recipient may infer that they are the target of someone’s ire.
The tenacity of glitter is astonishing. It adheres to surfaces indefinitely, creating an illusion of perpetual presence. Many individuals have experienced the disconcerting phenomenon of finding glitter on their person long after they have distanced themselves from its source. The origin of this unyielding material is shrouded in mystery, prompting theories that it may spawn from realms of chaos alongside other disorganized entities, such as Legos and Rainbow Loom bands.
Furthermore, it is crucial to note that a significant portion of glitter is classified as microplastic. Microplastics are defined as minute plastic fragments measuring less than five millimeters, which pose severe threats to marine ecosystems. According to the National Ocean Service, these particles contribute to ecological degradation and the proliferation of harmful bacteria within aquatic environments. Essentially, glitter can be described as a “sparkly pollutant.”
In my previous life, post-night-out rituals involved washing away the remnants of glittery makeup, subsequently allowing these particles to enter the water supply, ultimately reaching our oceans—a detrimental cycle that cannot be ignored.
For those who share my disdain for glitter, it may be prudent to dissuade children from its use in arts and crafts by emphasizing the environmental implications. After all, preserving marine life, including our beloved whales, should take precedence.
However, for individuals who remain attached to glitter—perhaps driven by a penchant for Pinterest or other social media trends—there exist alternatives. Biodegradable glitter is emerging as a viable option, alleviating some environmental concerns. Companies, such as Glitter Revolution, produce glitter derived from plant cellulose, offering a more eco-friendly alternative, although it may still exhibit the same pervasive characteristics.
For those engaged in the journey of parenthood and seeking assistance with family planning, consider exploring resources like Make A Mom, an innovative at-home insemination company that provides the only re-usable options on the market. To understand how this process works, please refer to this guide. For those interested in connecting with potential sperm donors, the Make A Mom Facebook group offers a free matching service. Additionally, for a comprehensive overview of fertility options, Medical News Today is an excellent resource.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while glitter may once have represented carefree fun, its long-lasting impact on the environment and its troublesome nature in parenting necessitate a reconsideration of its use. Embracing alternatives such as biodegradable options can mitigate harm while still allowing for creative expression.