In a thought-provoking critique, writer and activist Emma Grant boldly challenges the flawed premise of the “Walk Up” movement in the wake of gun violence incidents, particularly the tragic events at Parkland. Responding to a viral suggestion encouraging students to “walk up instead of out,” Grant asserts that this approach is not only misguided but potentially harmful as well.
The Misguided Premise of “Walk Up”
The “Walk Up” initiative promotes the idea that students should engage with their peers in a spirit of kindness rather than participating in protests aimed at demanding gun reform. While the notion of kindness itself is commendable, Grant argues that placing the burden of preventing mass shootings on young individuals—by urging them to befriend isolated classmates—is both inappropriate and unjust.
Kindness vs. Accountability
In her commentary, Grant expresses her long-standing advocacy for kindness within families and communities. However, she emphasizes that the call for “walking up” trivializes the real issues at hand. “Imagine a group of children who have suffered abuse organizing a rally to demand protection from their abusers,” she posits. “Would it be acceptable for me to suggest they simply go home and be nicer to their parents?” This analogy highlights the absurdity of expecting victims to bear the responsibility for the actions of their aggressors.
Victim-Blaming and Its Consequences
Grant’s argument continues to resonate as she points out that the survivors of Parkland are, unequivocally, victims of violence. Suggesting that they should have acted differently to prevent the tragedy is a form of victim-blaming that undermines their experiences. “If we wouldn’t tell victims of domestic violence to simply be kinder to their abusers, why would we expect children to show compassion to someone who poses a lethal threat?” she asks.
The Complexity of Violence Prevention
The notion that kindness can single-handedly avert violence is a simplistic and ineffective approach. Young people today are more than capable of engaging in meaningful discussions and advocating for change. The resilience and activism demonstrated by the Parkland survivors exemplify their understanding of the complexities surrounding gun violence.
A Call for Systemic Change
Concluding her remarks, Grant aptly compares the “Walk Up” movement to the “All Lives Matter” slogan, arguing that both serve to divert attention from the systemic issues that require urgent action. “This is not a responsibility that should fall on our children,” she insists. “It is up to us as adults to create a safer environment. Keep advocating, kids. We stand with you.”
Further Insights
For those seeking further insights into home insemination and related topics, you can explore our other blog posts at Home Insemination Kit or check out Make A Mom for comprehensive resources. Additionally, News Medical offers valuable information on pregnancy and home insemination.
Conclusion
In summary, Emma Grant’s critique of the “Walk Up” movement highlights the dangers of placing the responsibility of preventing violence on victims, advocating instead for a focus on systemic change. Young people deserve to be empowered as advocates rather than being expected to shoulder blame for tragedies they did not cause.