On April Fool’s Day, a popular family vlogging duo, the Johnsons, decided to pull a prank on their six-year-old daughter, Lily, by pretending to give away their beloved puppy, Max. However, rather than eliciting laughs, the video turned out to be quite distressing and drew significant criticism from viewers online.
The sight of Lily sobbing over the thought of losing her furry friend was a strong critique of both the prank and the holiday itself. Parents Jake and Emily, while attempting to have fun, didn’t seem thrilled with how their joke unfolded. Perhaps broadcasting a child’s emotional turmoil regarding a fictional loss involving a cherished pet isn’t the best idea? Just a thought.
About the Video
In the video titled, “We Have to Say Goodbye to Max… Forever :(,” the Johnson family includes Jake, Emily, and their children, Lily and Noah. Both Jake and Emily garnered fame online prior to their marriage, and they’ve continued to document their family life for their followers.
With nearly 8.7 million subscribers on YouTube, the Johnsons have a considerable online presence, including large followings on Instagram (even Max has more followers than most people!). Their content typically showcases wholesome family moments and adventures. Yet, during a seemingly normal vlog filled with family activities, they abruptly shifted to a scene where Lily was inconsolable on the couch.
Jake and Emily explained that Lily was upset because they claimed Max had to leave the family due to their busy schedules and an upcoming move. After some coaxing, Lily sat up, clinging to Max, while her parents suggested giving him away.
What followed was several painful minutes of Lily’s tears, with Emily occasionally chuckling in the background. Eventually, they revealed it was a prank, which only intensified Lily’s sadness. “Did we go too far?” Jake asked the camera, and viewers unanimously replied, “Yes, definitely.”
Viewer Reactions
This prank was executed on March 31, which many found to be beyond inappropriate. The Johnsons are known for their playful antics, typically involving each other rather than their children. Perhaps they should reconsider their approach and save the pranks for adults instead. The comments on their April Fool’s video have since been disabled, indicating they might have realized their mistake.
Resources for Family Planning
For more insights into family planning and resources, visit this post. If you’re looking for an authority in at-home insemination, check out Cryobaby’s resources. Additionally, the UCSF Center provides excellent information related to pregnancy and home insemination.
Conclusion
In summary, the Johnson family’s attempt at an April Fool’s prank backfired, resulting in their daughter’s distress and significant backlash from viewers. While pranks can be entertaining, the emotional impact on children should always be considered.