During a contentious Oval Office meeting earlier this year, former President Donald Trump allegedly proposed extreme measures to control immigration at the U.S.-Mexico border. According to a report by The New York Times, Trump suggested the idea of “shooting migrants in the legs” to deter them from crossing into the United States. This shocking recommendation came after his aides informed him that shooting migrants who throw rocks would be illegal.
Unconventional Strategies for Border Control
An excerpt from the book “Border Conflicts: Inside Trump’s Fight Against Immigration”, which draws from interviews with numerous White House officials, reveals that Trump’s frustration over border issues led him to come up with several unconventional strategies. In addition to the violent suggestion, he reportedly considered building a moat filled with snakes or alligators as a means to fortify the border wall, even asking his staff to obtain cost estimates for such a bizarre idea.
Advisers expressed concerns that these plans could not only hinder American tourists traveling to Mexico but also disrupt the education of children on both sides of the border and potentially trigger economic crises in both nations. It’s worth noting that back in May, Trump laughed along with a rally crowd when someone suggested that the government should shoot immigrants.
Funding Controversies
Moreover, the funding for Trump’s proposed border wall has raised eyebrows. Just last month, Defense Secretary Mark Esper announced a delay or suspension of $3.6 billion earmarked for 127 military projects to divert funds for the wall. This included money meant for crucial facilities like child development centers and schools for military families around the world, which highlights the far-reaching impacts of his border policies.
Trump’s Frustration and Legal Challenges
During the March meeting, Trump reportedly lashed out at his staff, declaring, “You are making me look like a fool! I ran on this. It’s my issue.” The attendees included prominent figures such as Stephen Miller, then-Homeland Security Secretary, and Jared Kushner, among others. Despite the efforts of his aides to offer sensible alternatives, Trump remained obstinate, insisting on immediate action.
Since then, he has faced legal challenges and public backlash regarding his immigration policies, and many who tried to temper his more radical ideas have lost their positions.
Conclusion
In summary, Trump’s alarming suggestions during a meeting about immigration reveal a troubling approach to border control, raising serious ethical and legal questions alongside significant implications for military funding and public safety.