artificial insemination kit for humans
Recently, I was unexpectedly labeled online as a “Liberal.” As I read the comment, I nearly choked on my afternoon tea. How did this happen to me?
Despite the significant public attention, it was just another week in the life of a physician: reviewing medical journals, understanding new protocols, and sharing recommendations. Coincidentally, the latest guidelines directly affected my child’s safety, prompting me and my fellow local doctors to draft a letter urging compliance with the advice from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control. We advocated for everyone to wear masks in schools as a way to ensure the safe return of all children, especially the most vulnerable.
Several doctors who supported evidence-based practices received harsh anonymous calls, and some colleagues criticized their involvement. It left me pondering: as someone who focuses on clinical research rather than political news, was it naive to think that medical recommendations existed outside of politics?
As I let my scones cool on the stand, I questioned why adhering to medical advice is now perceived as a political stance.
We’re living in a time dominated by guidelines and protocols. The treatment methods for COVID-19 are relatively new, with their efficacy still being assessed. Many patients, when faced with illness, have urgently sought any possible treatment, even if experimental. Were those who labeled me as “canceled” suggesting they would reject any evidence-based care?
A childhood friend recently sought my guidance regarding her mother’s newly discovered breast mass. I could have recommended an unconventional treatment, like using high doses of veterinary antibiotics, but instead, I referred her to a reputable surgeon at a leading cancer center. In that moment, was I acting as a liberal or simply fulfilling my role as a physician?
At my medical training program, we had a saying: if there are no side effects, does it even work? This highlights the importance of conducting thorough risk-benefit analyses, which is why physicians rely on established guidelines rather than improvising their practice.
The backlash against a recommendation based on evidence shouldn’t have surprised me. We have straightforward, accessible methods to protect ourselves and our communities, like wearing masks and getting vaccinated. Yet, many choose to disregard these measures.
Reflecting on these events, I feel a sense of sadness—not just because of the personal attacks I faced. Is following medical guidelines, and advocating for health, now considered a liberal trait? Are we in a time where the age-old principle of helping one another has become politicized?
If you’re interested in further insights on pregnancy and home insemination, check out this excellent resource. For more information on at-home insemination kits, visit this link.
Summary
This article reflects on the perplexing intersection of medicine and politics, where following evidence-based guidelines is often mischaracterized as a political stance. The author, a physician, shares personal experiences of backlash from the community for advocating safety measures like masking and vaccination. The discourse raises questions about the politicization of healthcare and the moral responsibility of medical professionals to prioritize patient safety over political affiliations.