In 2014, while pregnant with twins and disturbed by an article about a measles outbreak in California—a disease that had been largely managed through vaccination—I penned an impassioned essay expressing my views on immunizations. I firmly maintained that vaccination is not merely a personal decision. Choices like whether to breastfeed or select organic foods for our children are personal; decisions about vaccinations have the potential to affect entire communities. I have always believed in a well-structured vaccination schedule for children, spread over several years.
The response to my essay was intense and, at times, harsh. Critics labeled me uneducated, ignorant, and even worse. They questioned my authority to assert that vaccinations aren’t simply a matter of personal choice.
I understood the pushback. People often resist being told what to do, especially regarding their medical decisions. I empathize with that sentiment. I wouldn’t want others dictating my choices about birth control or how I choose to raise my children. However, in my view, asking people to make informed decisions based on scientific evidence is essential for the collective good.
Many argued that vaccines caused autism, citing a discredited study by Dr. Andrew Wakefield. Others pointed to statistics on vaccine injuries, which, while they seem alarming, are often misrepresented. A recent article in Time highlighted that, from 2006 to 2014, there were 2.5 billion vaccinations administered, with only 1,876 cases compensated out of 2,967 adjudicated—making the risk of a vaccine injury less than one in a million. In fact, the odds of being struck by lightning are higher at 1 in 960,000, which puts the situation into stark perspective.
When I wrote that essay, I was expressing the fears of a mother horrified by the suffering caused by vaccine-preventable diseases. I was heartbroken watching families struggle with illnesses like pertussis. It infuriated me that many chose to believe a discredited study instead of listening to scientists and medical professionals.
What I should have done was direct readers towards credible sources, such as the World Health Organization and Voices for Vaccines, which provide solid information about the importance of immunization.
Despite the backlash, my belief in science remained steadfast. I have four children and ensure they are vaccinated according to a schedule. I live in a country where vaccinations are mandatory for certain diseases, and optional vaccines are accessible and affordable. This isn’t a decision I make blindly or because of some conspiracy; I am a mother who has conducted thorough research and chooses to protect my community.
Critics often dismissed me as “just a former public relations person,” suggesting my lack of medical credentials disqualified my opinions. Ironically, many who opposed my views were not medical professionals either. While I lack a medical degree, I am well-informed about my children’s health, including the efficacy and safety of vaccines. I have read extensively about both the dangers associated with skipping vaccinations and how immunizations have eradicated numerous deadly diseases worldwide.
On September 27, 2016, the Pan American Health Organization announced the eradication of measles from the Americas, a significant public health achievement. Yet, health officials warn that measles can return if vaccination rates drop. The recent outbreak in Italy serves as a cautionary tale. This is where the concept of herd immunity becomes crucial.
Herd immunity protects those who cannot be vaccinated, such as infants or individuals with certain health conditions. A substantial portion of the population must be immunized to ensure the safety of those who cannot be.
It seems that attitudes toward vaccinations are shifting. In the comments on my original article, many parents expressed support for scheduled immunizations. One former anti-vaccination mother shared her story of how her perspective changed after her children contracted rotavirus—an illness preventable through vaccination. Unfortunately, it often takes personal experience with these diseases for people to reconsider their stance.
After publishing my initial essay, someone approached me about debating a naturopath who opposes vaccinations. I declined. I no longer wish to engage in debates about the merits of vaccination. It’s not merely a personal choice; it’s a communal obligation. I refuse to engage in name-calling or insults. There is valid research available for those willing to consider it.
Instead of arguing, I choose to advocate for informed decisions. I am not here to shout or shame anyone. My aim is to encourage others to protect their children and communities. Vaccination is a critical step in safeguarding public health. Let’s work together to ensure a healthier future for all.
For more insights on family planning and health, you might explore our blog on intracervical insemination or check out WebMD for excellent resources on pregnancy and home insemination. Additionally, for those considering fertility supplements, Make a Mom offers valuable information.
Summary:
The article discusses the importance of vaccinations as a community responsibility rather than a personal choice. It reflects on the backlash faced by those advocating for vaccinations, highlights the significance of herd immunity, and emphasizes the need for informed decision-making based on credible research. The author encourages parents to protect their children and communities through immunization.