Stop Using Animals to Justify Your Homophobia, Seriously!

happy pregnant womanhome insemination kits with syringes

It’s a common refrain from those harboring homophobic views: “Homosexuality is unnatural. Just look at the animal kingdom! Every animal has a male and a female, and that’s how it works in nature. Humans should follow suit!”

Let’s get real for a moment. This argument is a classic example of misunderstanding biology. It’s often trotted out by individuals who want to dismiss the legitimacy of queer identities. They claim that because two individuals of the same sex can’t reproduce, forming romantic or sexual connections must be unnatural. They believe that animal behavior sets a standard for what is “normal” in human relationships.

But here’s the catch: many animals exhibit same-sex behaviors! Moreover, why would we even use animal behavior as a yardstick for human morality or social norms? It’s a bizarre comparison. If we really followed the animal kingdom’s lead, we’d be engaging in some pretty unsavory practices, from sniffing each other to throwing poop. Gross, right?

In a recent TikTok video, a creator hilariously pointed out the absurdity of this argument, asking, “When did animals become our moral compass, especially regarding sex?” It’s a fair question.

When faced with the “it’s unnatural” claim, the tendency is to counter with examples of same-sex sexual behavior in various species. Fish can change gender at will, and many animals, like dolphins and giraffes, engage in same-sex activities. Evolutionary biologists suggest that such behaviors may have developed alongside mating strategies to ensure reproductive success.

Those who cling to the “it’s unnatural” argument usually lack a solid understanding of biology and evolution, often repeating memes or statements heard from others. Notably, some might even get offended if you remind them that humans are, in fact, animals.

Interestingly, those who often voice this homophobic argument may also identify as religious, rejecting scientific explanations of the natural world. Many Christians consider humans separate from animals, created in a divine image, yet paradoxically use animal behavior to justify their prejudices. It’s a contradiction that just doesn’t hold water.

While statistically, most people may transition through traditional gender norms and mate with the opposite sex, it’s crucial to recognize that variations exist naturally, just like in the animal kingdom. We absolutely do not need to rely on animal behavior to validate human experiences.

Ultimately, it’s quite odd to look to the animal world for guidance on human morality and social interactions. Embracing the diversity of human experience without drawing comparisons to giraffes or other animals would serve everyone better.

For more information on alternative ways to start a family, check out this excellent resource on pregnancy and home insemination. If you’re interested in home insemination kits, you might find this link useful. And for additional insights, consider visiting our post on intracervical insemination.

Search Queries:

In summary, using the animal kingdom to defend homophobia is not only misguided but also fails to recognize the complexity of human social behavior. Let’s celebrate our differences rather than compare ourselves to other species.